Northern Bottlenose Whale

Updated: March 2018

The northern bottlenose whale is a medium-sized toothed whale belonging to the ziphiid or beaked whale family, found only in the northern North Atlantic Ocean. These whales are somewhat dolphin-like in appearance, with a beak and falcate dorsal fin, but are much larger than most dolphins. The dorsal fin is also smaller and placed further along the back than a dolphin’s. The flippers are small and blunt, and the tail flukes generally do not have a median notch.

Sightings of northern bottlenose whales in the North Atlantic, showing sightings from all North Atlantic Sightings Surveys, 1987 - 2015. Not all areas were surveyed in each year.


Populations in the North East Atlantic estimated to be 19,539 in 2017. Scotian Shelf population estimated to number 164 animals in 2011.


Six recognized areas of concentration, four in the north-eastern Atlantic around Iceland, Svalbard and two locations off mainland Norway and two in Canadian waters off Nova Scotia and off Labrador and into Davis Strait-southern Baffin Bay.


Currently not hunted.


NAMMCO provides advice to the member countries on conservation status.

© Line Anker Kyhn

© Line Anker Kyhn

Latin: Hyperoodon ampullatus
Faroese: Døglingur
Icelandic: Andarnefja
Greenlandic: Anarnaq
Norwegian: Nebbhval,  andehval, nordlig nebbhval
Danish: Nordlig døgling
English: Northern bottlenose whale, Bottlehead, North Atlantic bottlenose whale


Females average about 27 years – males average about 37 years


Adults up to 11 meters in length and weighs up to 8 tons. Mature males are around 1 meter longer than females


Indications of various migration strategies from long distances to smaller distances and some not migrating at all


Appear to occupy a very narrow niche in terms of their feeding, with their primary prey item being deepwater squid

General characteristics

The northern bottlenose whale (Hyperoodon ampullatus) is a medium-sized toothed whale belonging to the ziphiid or beaked whale family, found only in the northern North Atlantic Ocean. Adult lengths are from 7 to 9m on average (DFO 2017) and may reach 10 or 11m, with mature males being generally 1m larger than mature females (COSEWIC 2011). These whales are somewhat dolphin-like in appearance, with a beak and falcate dorsal fin, but are much larger than most dolphins. Adult males can weigh from 7,000 to 8,000kg, while adult females can be from 5,000 to 6,000kg (Kovacs and Lydersen 2017). The dorsal fin is also smaller and placed further along the back than a dolphin’s. The flippers are small and blunt, and the tail flukes generally do not have a median notch.

The northern bottlenose whale could be confused with Sowerby’s or Cuvier’s beaked whale, as the ranges of these species overlap in some areas, but they can be distinguished by differences in body colouration and by the distinct “melon” or forehead of the northern bottlenose.

© Line Anker Kyhn

Northern bottlenose whales have distinctive pronounced foreheads, which is bulbous in females and immatures, and more flattened and whitish coloured in mature males. The “beak” carries a single pair of small conical teeth at the tip of the lower jaw, but these usually have erupted through the gums only in older males.

The overall body colour ranges from light grey to brown, with a lighter underside. Some have suggested that the brown colour results from a film of diatoms on the body (Mead 1989). Calves are grey with dark eye patches and a light-coloured forehead when they are born. Juveniles have a similar appearance, with darker coloured bodies and lighter coloured heads. They also have a more rounded beak and smaller forehead than the adult whales. In older adults, the melon and face often become a light gray colour, turning almost white in older males.

Life History and Ecology


The behaviour of northern bottlenose whales is characterised by two main features: their diving ability and their curiosity.

Northern bottlenose whales are among the deepest-diving mammal species in the world, with dives often lasting an hour at depths of over 1,000 metres. The longest and deepest dive recorded so far for this species was 94 minutes to a depth of 2,340m (Sivle et al. 2015, Miller et al. 2015). In another study, a tagged individual made regular dives to over 800m (Hooker and Baird 1999). The same study noted two distinct types of dives that the whales made:  `short duration and shallow’ and `long duration and deep’. The short shallow dives generally follow a long deep dive, as the whales remain at or near the surface, sometimes for an hour or more (Whitehead  and Hooker 2011). While at the surface, whales sometimes remain quite still, and at other times may swim quickly in various directions, jump or breach out of the water (Reeves et al. 1993). It has been suggested that the short shallow dives following a series of deep dives may serve to reduce tissue and blood supersaturation of nitrogen and so prevent decompression sickness (the “bends”) in these whales (Hooker et al. 2009). They may also have certain physiological adaptations to reduce the risk of decompression sickness during their normal diving routine, but these are unknown at present.

The whales often socialize at the surface between dives, in groups of from 4  to 20 animals. There is some segregation in the groups by age and sex. Females appear to have looser networks of more short-term relationships while associations between some may males last for several years (Culik 2010, COSEWIC 2011, Whitehead and Hooker 2012). Agression between males is rare, though they have been observed head butting each other (Gowans et al. 2001).

© Line Anker Kyhn

Northern bottlenose whales appear to be curious. They will approach slow moving or stationary boats and seem to be attracted by unfamiliar noises, such as those made by ships’ motors or generators. A consequence of this behaviour is that bottlenose whales were easily captured by whalers. Another aspect of their behaviour that often led to their capture was their tendency to remain by wounded companions (Mead 1989, Miller et al. 2015).

Northern bottlenose whales make a variety of low-intensity sounds in the human hearing range, and also produce ultrasonic clicks. These clicks are produced when the whales are foraging, and are thought to be used for echolocation of their prey. The pattern and frequency range used is distinctive to bottlenose whales (Hooker and Whitehead 2002, Wahlberg et al. 2011).

Life History

The biology of these whales is not well known. Their generally remote and patchy distribution combined with their lengthy deep diving behaviour makes them difficult to study. Most of the information known about northern bottlenose whales comes from two main sources: the first from the analyses of whales hunted by Norwegian whalers (e.g. Benjaminsen 1972, Christensen 1973, Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979), and the second from studies of living individually photoidentified whales off the Scotian Shelf of Canada, primarily in a submarine canyon called the Gully (e.g. Gowans et al. 2001, Wimmer and Whitehead 2004).

Males become sexually mature at between 7 to 11 years old, with females maturing slightly later, at between 8 and 12 years old (Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979). Individual life span is estimated at from 27 years for females to 37 years for males (Christensen 1973, Mead 1989).

The peak time for mating and calving is spring to early summer (Reeves et al. 1993). The main calving period occurs in July – August for whales off the Scotian shelf (Harris et al. 2013). Gestation is thought to be 12 months (Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979, Reeves et al. 1993). Females are thought to give birth every second year, although fewer calves are observed in the Gully population than would be expected if this is the case (Whitehead and Hooker 2011). Of 3113 sightings between 1988 and 1999, only 6% were recorded as first-year calves (Whitehead and Hooker 2012). Females in this population may produce a calf every third year. Bottlenose whales in the Baffin Bay – Davis Strait area calve earlier than those off the Scotian shelf, with a peak around April (Whitehead and Hooker 2012).

Food and feeding

Northern bottlenose whales appear to occupy a very narrow niche in terms of their feeding, with their primary prey item being deepwater squid from the genus Gonatus. In the northern parts of their range the primary species is Gonatus fabricii, whereas in more southerly waters G. steenstrupi  is more commonly eaten. This corresponds to the distribution of these two squid species. In one study, Gonatus sp. made up more than 99 and 98% of the estimated weight of prey items eaten for 2 whales stranded from the North Sea (Santos et al. 2001). A fatty acid analysis of these prey species found that squid represent a relatively rich food source in terms of their lipid content (Hooker et al. 2001).

Other species of squid are also taken. Stomach contents of 9 whales stranded in the Faroe Islands contained at least 13 different squid species (Bloch et al. 1996), while the contents from whales stranded in the North Sea contained at least 16 different species in one study (Santos et al. 2001) and 21 different species in another (Fernández et al. 2014). Other common taxa found apart from Gonatus are Teuthowenia spp., Taonius pavo and Histioteuthis reversa (Hooker et al. 2001). For 10 whales stranded in the North Sea, Gonatus spp., Teuthowenia spp. and Taonius pavo together made up more than 90% of the total diet both by weight and number (Fernández et al. 2014).

Fish remains have also been found in the stomachs of northern bottlenose whales, both from stranded animals and those hunted commercially. The numbers found, however, have always been low when compared to cephalopod prey remains, and have been found to vary by location: 50% of the whales studied from off Labrador contained fish remains, while only 10% of those off Iceland had eaten any fish (Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979). Fish species found include redfish (Sebastes sp.), Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), rabbitfish (Chimaera monstrosa), spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias), ling (Molva molva) and skate (Raja sp.)( Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979). Northern bottlenose whales occasionally also take other benthic organisms such as sea cucumbers, starfish and prawns (Reeves et al. 1993,Taylor et al. 2008).


Northern bottlenose whales have few predators apart from humans. Whaling crews have observed killer whales attacking and feeding on them (in Harris et al. 2013) and some whales bear scars likely from previous attacks.

Distribution and habitat

Northern bottlenose whales are found only in the northern North Atlantic Ocean, occurring in cool and subarctic waters, generally north of about 40°N (COSEWIC 2011). They may travel into broken ice fields, but are more commonly found in open water. On the western side of the Atlantic they are distributed from Nova Scotia to the Davis Strait, though there have been strandings and sightings as far south as North Carolina in the US (Taylor et al. 2008).The best-studied subpopulation of these whales is found in the waters over “the Gully,” a large submarine canyon off Nova Scotia, Canada (location 44◦N, 59◦W). The Gully is the southernmost area that northern bottlenose whales consistently occupy in the western Atlantic (Wimmer and Whitehead 2004). In the mid north Atlantic, their range includes both the west and east coasts of Greenland and around Iceland. On the eastern side of the Atlantic, they are found from England north along most of the Norwegian coast and up to the west coast of Svalbard, preferring the deep waters of the Norwegian Sea. There are no confirmed records from around Novaya Zemlya (Culik 2010) but there have been incidental sightings in the western Barents Sea (Øien and Hartvedt, 2011). Northern bottlenose whales have occasionally been seen in both the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas, and have been observed off the Azores and as far south as the Cape Verde Islands (Taylor et al. 2008, Culik 2010, COSEWIC 2011).

These whales prefer deep waters, generally from 800 to 1,800m deep. They are most abundant in waters over 1,000m deep and so are usually found seaward of the continental shelf or in areas of submarine canyons (Reeves et al. 1993, Whitehead and Hooker 2012). Three such canyons, where northern bottlenose whales have been intensively studied, are found on the eastern Scotian Shelf off Nova Scotia, Canada. They are named “the Gully”, Shortland Canyon, and Haldimand Canyon. These canyons are thought to be areas where the whale’s main prey (Gonatus squid) accumulates, but also where the whales socialise, mate, and rear their young (DFO 2007). In 2010, these canyons were identified as critical habitat for the population under the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) (DFO 2017).

Northern Bottlenose whale © Line Anker Kyhn

Migrations and movements

It has been suggested that northern bottlenose whales undertake seasonal north-south migrations in some areas, particularly the northeastern Atlantic, but the evidence is not clear. Norwegian whalers felt that the whales reached their northern-most distribution in the NE Atlantic in spring and early summer, and that by July they were moving south (Reeves et al. 1993). From whaling data, both catch rates and sex ratios varied seasonally in different northeastern Atlantic locations (Benjaminsen 1972, Benjaminsen and Christensen 1979). This has been interpreted as a result of the whales moving northward in spring and southward in the fall. Strandings on the shores of Europe and Ireland occur most frequently in late summer and autumn, suggesting southward migration at that time (summary in Whitehead and Hooker 2011). One bottlenose whale tagged in the northeast Atlantic did appear to migrate, travelling from Jan Mayen Island to the Azores between 22 June and 4 August 2015 (Miller et al. 2015).

There is, however, some conflicting evidence. In the Norwegian Sea, sightings of bottlenose whales are higher between April and June, but they are sighted there throughout the year (Øien and Hartvedt 2011). Off the Faroe Islands, the whales strand and are caught year round, although in greater numbers in August and September (Bloch et al. 1996). In a feeding study, four whales stranded on European shores in the late summer were found to have been feeding in temperate rather than northern waters prior to stranding, based on the particular prey species found in their stomachs (Fernandez et al. 2014). It is possible that some of the distribution patterns thought to be north–south migrations could instead represent seasonal inshore–offshore movements following particular food resources (Whitehead and Hooker 2012).

On the western side of the Atlantic, the Scotian Shelf population does not seem to migrate, as whales are present in the Gully and the other canyons year round (COSEWIC 2011, Whitehead and Hooker 2011). There is some movement seen between canyons, especially by mature males, but some individuals, primarily females, show a preference for particular canyons (Wimmer and Whitehead 2004, Whitehead and Wimmer 2005).

Further north, northern bottlenose whales have been sighted in the Labrador Sea – Baffin Bay area during the winter, which seems to indicate that they too do not migrate seasonally (Reeves et al. 1993, Whitehead and Hooker 2012).

It could be that these whales have various migration strategies, even within a single population, with some individuals, age or sex classes migrating large distances, some small distances and some not at all.

North Atlantic stocks

There are no stocks identified for these whales, however there are six recognized areas of concentration, based on historic catch distributions. These could potentially represent separate stocks or populations.  Four of these are in the north-eastern Atlantic: around Iceland, around Svalbard, and two locations off mainland Norway, one off Andenes and the other off Møre. The other two are in Canadian waters: along the edge of the Scotian Shelf off Nova Scotia, and off Labrador and into Davis Strait-southern Baffin Bay (COSEWIC 2011, Whitehead and Hooker 2012).

The two Canadian concentrations have been found to be genetically different at both mitochondrial and nuclear markers, indicating that these are two separate populations (Dalebout et al. 2006). Whales in the Gully are also smaller and appear to breed at a different time of year than those found further north (Whitehead et al. 1997, COSEWIC 2011).

Dalebout et al. (2006) also compared the genetics of whales from Davis Strait with those sampled from near Iceland and found no genetic differences between those two groups.

Previously, some authors have considered that all the bottlenose whales caught east of Greenland belonged to a single population, with those west of Greenland belonging to a second population, but there is no biological evidence for this division. In 1976 the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) decided that there is only a single population of northern bottlenose whales (International Whaling Commission 1977).

Current abundance and trends

Estimating current population size for any of the concentration areas or potential stocks of the northern bottlenose whale is very difficult due to the remote and patchy distribution of these whales, as well as some of their particular behaviours.  Catch-per-unit-effort methods, for example, are compromised by the whales’ attraction to whaling vessels and their “standing-by” behaviour toward wounded companions. Population estimates made from visual ship surveys will be negatively biased because of the animals’ long dives, and positively biased because of their attraction to boats (Reeves et al. 1993). The attraction to vessels is especially hard to correct for, as the degree of attraction may vary with many factors such as location, season, and the type and speed of the survey vessel. Aerial surveys for these whales only face the deep-diving bias, but the length of time they spend underwater lowers the sighting rate such that not enough data is obtained to be able to make a population estimate.

Sightings of northern bottlenose whales in the North Atlantic, showing sightings from all North Atlantic Sightings Surveys, 1987 – 2015. Not all areas were surveyed in each year.

There have been some estimates made of the populations around Iceland and the Faroe Islands. Gunnlaugsson and Sigurjonsson (1990) estimated a population size of 4,925 (CV = 0.16) off Iceland and 902 (CV 0.45) off the Faroes, based on only 86 sightings made in 1987 and 1989. More recently, Pike et al. (2003) estimated that there were 27,900 whales (CV = 0.67) around both Iceland and the Faroe Islands based on a ship-based survey conducted in 1995 and 28,000 (CV = 0.22) from a similar survey in 2001. Cañadas et al. (2011 in Whitehead and Hooker 2012) made population estimates based on the data from the Faroese 2007 T-NASS ship surveys as well as the 2007 Cetacean Offshore Distribution and Abundance in the European Atlantic (CODA) surveys. They estimated 16,284 (CV = 0.41) northern bottlenose whales in the waters around the Faroes based upon 12 sightings, and 3,254 (CV = 0.70) in the CODA study area based upon 3 sightings.

These estimates were revised by Rogan et al. (2017) giving an abundance of 19,539 (95% CI: 9,921 – 38,482) for the North East Atlantic.  The survey areas (outlined in the map to the left taken from Rogan et al. 2017) are: SCANS-II 2005 (cyan), CODA 2007 (blue), and the Faroese block of T-NASS 2007 (red).

In Norwegian and adjacent waters, observations of bottlenose whales have been made during shipboard surveys where the target species is minke whales. Sightings however have been scarce. From 1987 to 2010 a total of 66 primary sightings were made.  Bottlenose whales are rarely seen off mainland Norway, but are more common around Svalbard. The most sightings in a single year occurred during the 2005 survey around Jan Mayen Island (13 sightings) and during the 2008 survey in the Svalbard area (13 sightings). In other years the number of sightings varied from 0 to 5 (Øien and Hartvedt 2011). There is not enough data to be able to make estimates of either population or density for this area.

The most-studied population, on the Scotian Shelf off Canada, contains approximately 164 adult and immature whales, and appears to be relatively stable, showing no statistically significant trend in the population size between 1988 and 2009 (COSEWIC 2011).

There is no abundance estimate for the Davis Strait – Labrador Sea population of northern bottlenose whale (COSEWIC 2011). Vessel-based and aerial survey efforts between 2003 and 2007 did not yield enough sightings to make a population estimate. The abundance of this population is presumed to be low (Whitehead and Hooker 2011).

Stock status

As discussed in the previous section, it is very difficult to obtain population estimates for this species and so determine with any certainty the past or current status of northern bottlenose whales. Some very rough estimates of the pre-whaling abundance have been made, and it is thought that there were on the order of 100,000 whales in the mid 1800s (Whitehead and Hooker 2012). By 1920, the population had been substantially reduced by fairly intensive whaling. The effects of a second phase of whaling which took place between 1937 and 1973 are less clear. There is some discussion about whether this second phase led to further depletion of the population, or whether it just slowed any population recovery. This uncertainty is due to the lack of both accurate current population sizes and information on the life history parameters of the species.

The population that has been most intensively studied, on the Scotian Shelf off Canada, currently appears to be stable, showing no statistically significant trend in the population size between 1988 and 2009 (COSEWIC 2011).

It is thought that the Baffin Bay-Davis Strait-Labrador Sea population must have been considerably larger than the Scotian Shelf population prior to the last phase of whaling in 1969, based on catch levels. The scarcity of recent sightings could mean that this population remains much reduced, but without more data from properly designed surveys and lacking any current abundance estimates it can only be concluded that the status of these whales is uncertain (DFO 2007, COSEWIC 2011).

There were perhaps a few tens of thousands of whales left in the 1970s after whaling had ceased. The global population size by the mid-1980s was thought to be about 54,000, or roughly 60% of the initial stock size (Taylor et al. 2008). While these whales have been unexploited for over 30 years, there is currently not enough information available to state whether or not the overall population is increasing, decreasing or staying stable. The range of these whales does not appear to have changed, and they are still found in most areas where whaling occurred, though they are rarely seen nowadays in areas of former concentration off mainland Norway. The signs of possible recovery are better off Svalbard, Iceland and the Faroe Islands where sightings are fairly common.

Uncertainty about the global status of the northern bottlenose whale led the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to list this species as “Data deficient” in its 2008 assessment (Taylor et al. 2008).


The Management Committee of NAMMCO receives advice from the Scientific Committee on the status of the northern bottlenose whale and makes recommendations to member countries based on that advice. The most recent advice with regard to bottlenose whales concerned the Faroe Islands. The Management Committee accepted that the traditional coastal drive hunt in the Faroe Islands did not have any noticeable effect on the stock and that removals of fewer than 300 whales a year were not likely to lead to a decline in the stock (NAMMCO 2015). Current removals in the Faroes are far lower than this, and only occur when whales strand themselves and cannot be driven back to sea. There were 5 such strandings in 2014 and only 2 in 2015 (NAMMCO 2015).

The northern bottlenose whale is listed as a “Protected Species” by the International Whaling Commission with a catch limit of zero, and as “Data deficient” by IUCN (Taylor et al. 2008). The species has been listed on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) since 1984, which means that there is no international trade allowed.

In Canada, the Scotian Shelf population is considered Endangered under the Canadian Species at Risk Act, and the Baffin-Labrador population was listed as of Special Concern by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in May 2011 (COSEWIC 2011). The Gully, a core habitat area for the Scotian shelf population, was designated a Marine Protected Area under the Oceans Act in 2004. This designation prohibits the disturbance, damage, destruction or removal of any living marine organism or habitat within the area (DFO 2017).

In Norway, northern bottlenose whales are protected in Svalbard (Kovacs and Lydersen 2017), and there has been no catches of these whales since 1973 (Reeves et al. 1993, Whitehead and Hooker 2012).

Hunting and utilisation

Historical catches

The northern bottlenose is one of only a few species of beaked whales to be hunted commercially on a large scale. It was initially hunted for its oil, including a form of spermaceti oil found in the head, and later on for its meat, used for pet and fur farm food.

Whaling for the northern bottlenose whale was concentrated in six general areas across the northern North Atlantic: the Scotian Shelf, Canada; the Labrador Sea and southern Baffin Bay, Canada; around Iceland, east Greenland and the Faroe Islands;  Andenes, Lofoten Islands, off northern mainland Norway; Møre, off southwestern mainland Norway; and Svalbard (Spitzbergen), Norway (Mead 1989).

The main whaling period began in the mid-1800s, as Scottish seal-hunting vessels began to target northern bottlenose whales. From 1877 to 1913, Scottish and British whalers hunted near Cumberland Sound, in Davis Strait, and in the waters off Greenland, and reported approximately 1,669 kills (Reeves et al. 1993, Harris et al. 2013). The British hunt in the Davis Strait – Labrador Sea ended in 1892 (DFO 2007).

The Norwegians began hunting bottlenose whales in the northeastern Atlantic in the late 1800s. They took approximately 56,389 whales between 1882 and the late 1920s primarily east of Greenland, though the early whaling records not always reliable or available (Whitehead and Hooker 2012). Whaling records from all areas also do not generally report struck but lost animals, so removal numbers could be higher. Bottlenose whales likely had a significant loss rate, as they tended to dive down and sink after being harpooned (ASCOBANS 2017) and were reported to be “difficult to kill and secure” (Reeves et al. 1993).

A more recent phase of whaling began in the late 1930s, with the resumption of bottlenose whaling by the Norwegians.  A total of 5,836 bottlenose whales were caught during the period 1938-1973, from the main hunting areas off Møre (western Norway), Andenes (northern Norway) and off Spitsbergen (Øien and Hartvedt 2011). Later on, bottlenose whaling expanded westwards to the areas between Iceland and Jan Mayen. Between 1969 and 1971, Norwegian whalers also hunted in the Baffin Bay − Labrador Sea area, taking 818 animals (Reeves et al. 1993, Harris et al. 2013). Norway has not hunted this species since 1973.

A Canadian hunt based out of Blandford, Nova Scotia, took place between 1962 and 1967. During this period, 87 whales were taken from the Scotian Shelf population (COSEWIC 2011). This population does not seem to have been subject to any hunt prior to that.

In the Faroe Islands, northern bottlenose whales have been taken occasionally in drive hunts or shot offshore for centuries. Catches are very low. Between 1584 and 1993, 648 bottlenose whales are reported to have been driven ashore in the Faroes, and 92 shot offshore (Bloch et al. 1996).

Commercial whaling of northern bottlenoses died out everywhere in the early 1970s due to a combination of several factors. The UK banned the import of meat from these whales, Norway found cheaper sources of food for the animals in its fur industry, minke whales became relatively more valuable, and protests against commercial whaling grew.

Recent catches

There is currently no hunt occurring for bottlenose whales. Some may be taken incidentally in the Faroe Islands if they strand and cannot be driven back to sea. In 2015, 2 whales were reported stranded there, and in 2014 there were 5 (NAMMCO 2015).

Greenland has reported catches of bottlenose whales in the recent past, however validation of these catches determined that they were actually harbour porpoises that had been incorrectly reported on the catch data form. Bottlenose whales are not normally hunted in Greenland (NAMMCO 2015).

Other human impacts

Some current human impacts on bottlenose whales include by-catch or entanglement in fishing gear, disturbance from oil and gas activities, acoustic disturbance, contaminants, possible changes in food supply, and vessel strikes.

Incidental catch or entanglement of northern bottlenose whales in fishing gear appears to be low. During the past 30 years, only nine entanglements or catches have been reported in Atlantic Canada by DFO. Four of these occurred on the Scotian Shelf, one on the Grand Banks, and three from the Davis Strait area (Harris et al. 2013).

Of the three fisheries implicated in the reported entanglements, only one is still active. The squid and the silver hake fisheries along the edge of the eastern Scotian Shelf ended in the mid 1980s and the late 1990s, respectively, and therefore no longer pose a threat. The swordfish longline fishery, as well as other pelagic longline fisheries, is still conducted in areas of known northern bottlenose whale distribution (DFO 2007).

In the Baffin Bay – Labrador Sea area, photographic and written observer records suggest a greater frequency of interaction with fishing activities than off the Scotian Shelf, for at least a portion of the northern bottlenose whale population. Lawson (2010, in COSEWIC 2011) noted that some whales had scars from fishing lines, and some had injuries that could have been caused by propellers or fishing gear.

There have also been other reports from the Davis Strait area. In once case, a fisherman reported a dead northern bottlenose whale caught in a Greenland halibut gillnet. Fisheries observers also reported one whale wrapped in a longline targeting Greenland halibut, which was able to be released alive. Another reported a whale caught by a trawler fishing for Greenland halibut (Harris et al. 2013). Overall, however, the mortality of northern bottlenose whales due to by-catch or entanglement is low.

© Line Anker Kyhn

Acoustic disturbance is considered a threat of great concern because of the dependence of these and other whales on sound for communication, socializing, foraging, navigation and sensing the environment. Potential sources of underwater noise include military exercises (SONAR, detonations), marine scientific research using sound, oil and gas exploration and extraction, vessel traffic, aircraft traffic, and construction.

The loud sounds produced by military SONAR has been implicated in fatal stranding events in other beaked whale species (DFO 2007, D’Amico et al. 2009), and represent a concern for bottlenose whales. In the UK, a number of bottlenose whale strandings over the past few decades appear to be clustered around a submarine testing site in Gairlochhead, near Glasgow (Culik 2010). It is not clear what the direct effects of the sounds are, but the deep-diving behaviour of northern bottlenose whales may make them especially vulnerable to physiological impacts from acoustic disturbance (DFO 2017).

In one field experiment near Jan Mayen Island, northern bottlenose whales were exposed to naval sonar. The whales showed marked behavioural changes when exposed to the noise. Whales stopped foraging, stopped producing foraging sounds and moved away from the area. The whales’ avoidance of the area started at rather low received sound levels and persisted for several hours after the end of exposure periods (Miller et al. 2015, Sivle et al. 2015).

Such behavioural changes could have long-term effects on the species, if animals that are feeding, resting, or breeding are disturbed by noise. Another effect could be that whales get displaced by noise and forced into areas of poorer habitat.

As discussed in a previous section, northern bottlenose whales have a fairly specialised diet, consisting largely of squid of the genus Gonatus. If whales are displaced by noise or other human activities away from the locations where they find this food, their survival could be compromised. There is currently no human fishery for these squid, but if one was to develop, this too could result in a lack of food for the whales.

Pollutants and the presence of contaminants is a concern for bottlenose whales, as it is for all marine species. Contaminants such as PCBs and organochlorine compounds have been found in bottlenose whale samples, at concentrations similar to other North Atlantic toothed whales (Hooker et al. 2008, DFO 2009). Concentrations of PCBs, DDTs and several other organochlorine compounds were higher in the blubber of whales sampled from The Gully than from the Davis Strait, with significant increases in 4,4′-DDE and trans-nonachlor in 2003 relative to 1996 (Hooker et al. 2008). The contaminant levels found in this study were below those suspected of causing health problems.

Research in NAMMCO member countries

While northern bottlenose whales are not the primary target species, sightings of them are recorded during the NAMMCO-coordinated Trans North Atlantic Sighting Surveys (T-NASS). In most cases, there are not enough sightings made to be able to produce a population estimate, and this species has a low priority for that work (NAMMCO 2016). There were also some sightings during recent Greenlandic surveys, but there are no plans to generate an abundance estimate from those (NAMMCO 2016).

In Iceland, one skin biopsy was obtained from a northern bottlenose whale in 2013 during a Marine Research Institute study on humpback whales. Bottlenose whale observations while on other surveys are also recorded (NAMMCO 2015).

ASCOBANS. 2017.  Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans in the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas  Accessed 18 Jan. 2017

Benjaminsen, T. 1972. On the biology of the bottlenose whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster). Norwegian Journal of Zoology 20:233-241.

Benjaminsen, T. and Christensen, I. 1979. The natural history of the bottlenose whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster). Pp. 143-164 in H.E. Winn, and B.L. Olla (eds.). Behavior of Marine Animals. Volume 3. Plenum, New York.

Bloch, D., Desportes, G., Zachariassen, M. and Christensen, I. 1996. The northern bottlenose whale in the Faroe Islands, 1584–1993. J. Zool. 239:123−140.

Christensen, I. 1973. Age determination, age distribution and growth of bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster), in the Labrador Sea. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21:331-340.

COSEWIC 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the northern bottlenose whale Hyperoodon ampullatus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 31pp.

Culik, B. 2010. Odontocetes. The toothed whales: “Hyperoodon ampullatus“. UNEP/CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.  CMS (Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals) 2017:   Accessed 18 Jan. 2017

Dalebout, M.L., Ruzzante, D.E., Whitehead, H. and Øien, N.I. 2006. Nuclear and mitochondrial markers reveal distinctiveness of a small population of bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus) in the western North Atlantic. Molecular Ecology 15:3115-3129.

D’Amico A, Gisiner RC, Ketten DR, Hammock JA, Johnson C, Tyack PL, Mead J. 2009. Beaked whale strandings and naval exercises. Aquat. Mamm. 35: 452–472.

DFO. 2017. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada.  Accessed 17 Jan. 2017.

DFO. 2009. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Contaminant Monitoring in the Gully Marine Protected Area. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2009/002.

DFO. 2007. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada.  Recovery potential assessment of northern bottlenose whale, Scotian Shelf population. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2007/011.

Fernández, R., Pierce, G.J.,  Macleod, C.D. , Brownlow, A., Reid, R.J., Rogan, E., Addink, M.,  Deaville,R., Jepson, P.D. and Begoña Santos, M. 2014. Strandings of northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus, in the north-east Atlantic: seasonality and diet. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK  94(6): 1109–1116.

Gowans, S., Whitehead, H. and Hooker, S.K. 2001. Social organization in northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus: not driven by deep-water foraging? Animal Behaviour 62: 369–377.

Gunnlaugsson, Th. and Sigurjónsson, J. 1990. NASS-87: Estimation of whale abundance based on observations made onboard Icelandic and Faroese survey vessels. Rep. int. Whal. Commn: 40, pp. 571-580.

Harris, L.E., Gross, W.E. and Emery, P.E. 2013. Biology, status, and recovery potential of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus). DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2013/038. v + 35 p.

Hooker, S.K. and Baird, R.W. 1999. Deep-diving behaviour of the northern bottlenose whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus (Cetacea: Ziphiidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 266:671-676.

Hooker, S. K. and Whitehead, H.  2002. Click characteristics of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 18: 69–80.

Hooker, S.K., Baird, R.W. and Fahlman, A. 2009. Could beaked whales get the bends? Effect of diving behaviour and physiology on modelled gas exchange for three species: Ziphius cavirostris, Mesoplodon densirostris and Hyperoodon ampullatus. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 167:235–246.

Hooker, S.K., Metcalfe, T.L., Metcalfe, C.D., Angell, C.M., Wilson, J.Y., Moore, M.J. and Whitehead, H. 2008. Changes in persistent contaminant concentration and CYP1A1 protein expression in biopsy samples from northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus, following onset of nearby oil and gas development. Environ. Pollut. 152: 205-216.

Hooker, S.K., Iverson, S.J., Ostrom, P. and Smith, S.C.  2001. Diet of northern bottlenose whales inferred from fatty-acid and stable-isotope analyses of biopsy samples. Can. J. Zool. 79: 1442-1454.

International Whaling Commission (IWC). 1977. Report of the working group on North Atlantic whales. Oslo, April 1976. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. 27: 369−387.

Kovacs, K.M. and Lydersen, C. 2017. Northern bottlenose whale. Norwegian Polar Institute. Accessed 19 Jan. 2017. Accessed 20 Jan. 2017.

Mead, J.G. 1989. Bottlenose Whales – Hyperoodon ampullatus (Forster, 1770) and Hyperoodon planifrons (Fowler, 1882); 321-348 pp. In: S.H. Ridgway and S.R. Harrison (eds.). Handbook of marine mammals. Volume 4: River dolphins and the larger toothed whales. Academic Press, London, UK.

Miller, P.J.O., Kvadsheim, P.H., Lam, F.P.A., Tyack, P.L., Curé, C., DeRuiter, S.L., Kleivane, L., Sivle, L.D.,van IJsselmuide,S.P., Visser, F.,Wensveen,P.J., von Benda-Beckmann,A.M.,  Martín López, L.M., Narazaki, T. and Hooker, S.K. 2015. First indications that northern bottlenose whales are sensitive to behavioural disturbance from anthropogenic noise. R. Soc. open sci. 2: 140484.

NAMMCO 2016. Report of the 23rd Meeting of the NAMMCO Scientific Committee. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO). SC/23/Report  291 p.

NAMMCO 2015. Annual report 2015. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO). 374 p.

Øien, N. and Hartvedt, S. 2011 Northern bottlenose whales Hyperoodon ampullatus in Norwegian and adjacent waters. Paper presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2011 SC/63/SM1. Cambridge: IWC.

Pike, D.G., Gunnlaugsson, T., Víkingsson, G.A., Desportes, G. and Mikkelson, B. 2003. Surface abundance of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampulatus) from NASS-1995 and 2001 shipboard surveys. NAMMCO/ SC/ 11/AE/ 11, Tromsø.

Reeves, R.R., Mitchell, E. and Whitehead, H. 1993. Status of the northern bottlenose whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus. Can. Field-Nat. 107:490-508.

Rogan, E., Canadas, A., Macleod, K., Santos, B., Mikkelsen, B., Uriarte, A., Van Canneyt, O., Vazquez, J.A., Hammond, P.S. 2017. Distribution, abundance and habitat use of deep diving cetaceans in the North East Atlantic. Deep–Sea Research Part II (2017),

Santos, M.B., Pierce, G.J., Smeenk, C., Addink, M.J., Kinze, C.C., Tourgaard, S. and Herman, J.  2001. Stomach contents of northern bottlenose whales Hyperoodon ampullatus stranded in the North Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 81:143-150.

Sivle, L.D., Kvadsheim, P.H., Curé, C., Isojunno, S., Wensveen, P.J., Lam,F-P. A., Visser, F., Kleivane, L., Tyack, P.L., Harris, C.M. and Miller, P.J.O.  2015. Severity of expert-identified behavioural responses of humpback whale, minke whale, and northern bottlenose whale to naval sonar. Aquatic Mammals 41(4): 469-502.

Taylor, B.L., Baird, R., Barlow, J., Dawson, S.M., Ford, J., Mead, J.G., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Wade, P. & Pitman, R.L. 2008. Hyperoodon ampullatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T10707A3208523. Accessed 16 Jan. 2017.

Wahlberg, M., Beedholm, K., Heerfordt, A. and Møhl, B. 2011. Characteristics of biosonar signals from the northern bottlenose whale, Hyperoodon ampullatus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130(5): 3077-3084.

Whitehead, H. and Hooker, S.K. 2012. Uncertain status of the northern bottlenose whale Hyperoodon ampullatus: population fragmentation, legacy of whaling and current threats. Endang. Species Res. 19: 47–61. (doi:10.3354/esr00458)

Whitehead, H. and Hooker, S.K. 2011. Status of northern bottlenose whales.  International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee. SC/63/SM4

Whitehead, H. and Wimmer, T. 2005. Heterogeneity and the mark-recapture assessment of the Scotian Shelf population of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus). Can. J.  Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62:2573-2585.

Whitehead, H., Gowans, S., Faucher, A. and McCarrey, S.W. 1997. Population analysis of northern bottlenose whales in the Gully, Nova Scotia. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 13:173-185.

Wimmer, T. and Whitehead, H. 2004. Movements and distribution of northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus, on the Scotian Slope and in adjacent waters. Can. J. Zool. 82:1782-1794

Canadian Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans:

Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society:

Norwegian Polar Institute:

ASCOBANS – Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans in the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas:

International Union for the Conservation of Nature, “Red List”:

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals:

Sea Watch Foundation:

Voices in the Sea, The northern bottlenose whale: – includes a sound recording

Start typing and press Enter to search